{"id":1171,"date":"2018-07-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2018-07-06T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/"},"modified":"2019-03-29T10:27:33","modified_gmt":"2019-03-29T10:27:33","slug":"patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/","title":{"rendered":"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer&#8217;s duty also in the case it has not patented the employee&#8217;s invention, but it has transferred it to a third party."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The decision n. 3165\/2018 has been published on 27 June 2018\u00a0in a proceedings in which an inventor employee has been assisted by Studio\u00a0Legale Sena e Tarchini against the employer company belonging to a\u00a0multinational group.<\/p>\n<p>It has confirmed that the employer company must reward the employee inventor with a fair compensation also when the invention has been patented by another company of the group.<\/p>\n<p>Confirming the valuable decision issued by the Judges in the\u00a0first instance, the Court&#8217;s decision is exhaustive and well structured; it\u00a0deals with the main issues concerning employees and inventions.<\/p>\n<p>The involved interest is very relevant, since the subject of\u00a0the patent has a strategic importance in the sector of chemical products.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The decision n. 3165\/2018 has been published on 27 June 2018\u00a0in a proceedings in which an inventor employee has been assisted by Studio\u00a0Legale Sena e Tarchini against the employer company belonging to a\u00a0multinational group. It has confirmed that the employer company must reward the employee inventor with a fair compensation also when the invention has [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":""},"categories":[32,37],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v18.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer&#039;s duty also in the case it has not patented the employee&#039;s invention, but it has transferred it to a third party. - Sena &amp; Partners<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer&#039;s duty also in the case it has not patented the employee&#039;s invention, but it has transferred it to a third party. - Sena &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The decision n. 3165\/2018 has been published on 27 June 2018\u00a0in a proceedings in which an inventor employee has been assisted by Studio\u00a0Legale Sena e Tarchini against the employer company belonging to a\u00a0multinational group. It has confirmed that the employer company must reward the employee inventor with a fair compensation also when the invention has [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sena &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-06T00:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-29T10:27:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Sena.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Studio Sena\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Studio Sena & Partners\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/\",\"sameAs\":[],\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#logo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SenaPartners.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SenaPartners.svg\",\"width\":448,\"height\":34,\"caption\":\"Studio Sena & Partners\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#logo\"}},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Sena &amp; Partners\",\"description\":\"Studio legale\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#webpage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/\",\"name\":\"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer's duty also in the case it has not patented the employee's invention, but it has transferred it to a third party. - Sena &amp; Partners\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-06T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-29T10:27:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer&#8217;s duty also in the case it has not patented the employee&#8217;s invention, but it has transferred it to a third party.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#webpage\"},\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5b7ed5228a7bd4019446963de71b39fe\"},\"headline\":\"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer&#8217;s duty also in the case it has not patented the employee&#8217;s invention, but it has transferred it to a third party.\",\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-06T00:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-29T10:27:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#webpage\"},\"wordCount\":155,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"News\",\"Patents\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5b7ed5228a7bd4019446963de71b39fe\",\"name\":\"Studio Sena\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#personlogo\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/72214f6a57d0b53ee3fffba6207cbb57?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/72214f6a57d0b53ee3fffba6207cbb57?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Studio Sena\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/senaiplaw.com\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer's duty also in the case it has not patented the employee's invention, but it has transferred it to a third party. - Sena &amp; Partners","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer's duty also in the case it has not patented the employee's invention, but it has transferred it to a third party. - Sena &amp; Partners","og_description":"The decision n. 3165\/2018 has been published on 27 June 2018\u00a0in a proceedings in which an inventor employee has been assisted by Studio\u00a0Legale Sena e Tarchini against the employer company belonging to a\u00a0multinational group. It has confirmed that the employer company must reward the employee inventor with a fair compensation also when the invention has [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/","og_site_name":"Sena &amp; Partners","article_published_time":"2018-07-06T00:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-29T10:27:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":1200,"url":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Sena.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Studio Sena","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Studio Sena & Partners","url":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/","sameAs":[],"logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#logo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SenaPartners.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/SenaPartners.svg","width":448,"height":34,"caption":"Studio Sena & Partners"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#logo"}},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/","name":"Sena &amp; Partners","description":"Studio legale","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#webpage","url":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/","name":"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer's duty also in the case it has not patented the employee's invention, but it has transferred it to a third party. - Sena &amp; Partners","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-06T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-29T10:27:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer&#8217;s duty also in the case it has not patented the employee&#8217;s invention, but it has transferred it to a third party."}]},{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#webpage"},"author":{"@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5b7ed5228a7bd4019446963de71b39fe"},"headline":"Patents: fair compensation for non-remunerated inventions ex art. 64 C.P.I.; The Milan Court of Appeal confirms employer&#8217;s duty also in the case it has not patented the employee&#8217;s invention, but it has transferred it to a third party.","datePublished":"2018-07-06T00:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-29T10:27:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#webpage"},"wordCount":155,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["News","Patents"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/senatarchinicom.kinsta.cloud\/en\/2018\/07\/06\/patents-faircompensation-for-non-remunerated-inventions-ex-art-64-c-p-i-the-milan-court-of-appeal-confirms-employersduty-also-in-the-case-it-has-not-patented-the-employees-inventi\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5b7ed5228a7bd4019446963de71b39fe","name":"Studio Sena","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/#personlogo","inLanguage":"en-US","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/72214f6a57d0b53ee3fffba6207cbb57?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/72214f6a57d0b53ee3fffba6207cbb57?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Studio Sena"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/senaiplaw.com"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1171"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1789,"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1171\/revisions\/1789"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/senaiplaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}